Constables Or Statute enforcers what’s the difference?

To which governmental department or minister are Police Scotland answerable to ? .

Why are they registered as business for profit ? .

When did  they becoming statute enforcers and revenue collectors . I  spoke to a constable  who is a member of this private organisation (Police Scotland) to which he has confirmed that they are driven by targets, and guide lines  which in turn lead to  financial penalties for the members of the public. What do they mea security force who lie ,cheats on the public.

The Police are now colluding with other organizations to cover up there obscene acts when it comes to pedophilia and the exposing of it.

ASSAULT

What does that mean exactly ? very ambiguous isn’t it, one size fits all so to speak, I looked it up and it said that it was referring to a vicious or violent attack. So how is it that when you are arguing with a member of your own family and the police get involved. this then is considered a assault. Assault should be be redefined precisely alleged.

In the UK, policing is, theoretically at least, grounded in public consent. When Sir Robert Peel founded the Metropolitan Police in 1829, he stated that the legitimacy of a police force in the eyes of the public depends on public approval of its existence and behaviours. Trust and accountability, said Peel, are paramount for an effective authority figure. And while police should not pander to public opinion, they must always strive to maintain the respect and support of the people it serves in this country, regardless of people’s wealth, background or social status.

The idea of policing by consent is a worthy concept. It should be strengthened and upheld for everybody’s benefit. If the “consent” element is damaged or lost, policing becomes an authoritarian exercise – just take a look at the United States or Brazil to see where that can lead to.

Which language do the legal profession Police,Government,Council,Courts and the Law society use to mislead the public?. They use legalese (language of the law society) and not common or plain english. The common english used by people everyday is nowadays peppered with words from legalese which are what can only be described as stealth or double edged words. As the majority of the public have no idea that theses words have a hidden meaning. Yet the are in every dat use by the masses. An example of this is the word ” Corporation “ it’s a combination of two words.

Corpus/corpo = dead body or corpse in Latin

Oration/orate = speak,talk  in Latin.

Which generally translates to a dead body or corpse which talks/speaks. That can’t be right??   that’s only one example of the words used by the agents of the ” corporate ” bodies including the government. I for one would like to see one of these dead bodies that can speak.

Have you ever wondered, when you are in your car. Are you really driving ?

We are often talking about where we were driving from or to. The term driving is used in everyday language i.e. I was driving to the shopping centre or I was driving all day.

The word drive is thrown at us by the so called authorities, police, courts & government. Like most people I also used to think that I drove my car from place to place. I now know that I travel and not drive.     .http://thelawdictionary.org/driver/

The authorities do not want people to know that they only drive when they are employed to operate certain modes of transport. The people who drive are those who are paid to act in commerce i.e. taxi drivers, bus drivers, truck drivers bus drivers etc.

All men & women are allowed to travel in their own conveyances upon the Queens highways & byways unencumbered. You only need to have drivers license if you are acting in commerce i.e. employed to drive.

The word drive is a legal term for example drive/driver is listed in Black’s law dictionary.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tf-R46c5BGE

This is where the authorities are lying to you to extort revenue from you.

MONEY

The government can lawfully print its  own money, interest free which would eliminate the need to  borrowing money from the Bank of England (at a rate of %), which is a privately owned bank.  Why don’t we the public demand that our government do exactly that print our own money backed by the people of Britain.

Banks are the puppet masters who are controlling most if not all of the worlds governments. the banks are broke and the public are been lied to by both the bankers and government.