When the council tries to convince you, the inhabitant of a property. That money has to be paid for council tax. The council will make its own documents, passing them off as court documents. Therein lies the fraud. To confirm the validity of the liability, you can ask for the case number for the order.

Only courts can send out summons (invitations). They will even suggest that there is a liability order. The way to confirm that there is a liability order, is to call the court to confirm if there is one. Nearly all the time the court will tell you that, there is no liability order. The council will send out a liability NOTICE. Anyone can send out a notice. They say all are obligated to pay whatever parliament decides. They forget that all are equal under the law. Also that there does not have to be any contract or acceptance of the obligations set upon the public. That would suggest that Parliament above the public. Does that not contradict the fact all are equal under the law. The bill or rights & The declaration of Arbroath remind us what was enacted for the benefit of the people.

Best to ask the legal team for the details of the liability order they claim they have.

There is no case number nor is the judge who signs the documents under their oath. They are not there for court related issues, they are there privately employed by the council.

Remember that the council operates on assumptions & presumptions i.e. guesswork. The council has a lawful duty to provide proof of the obligation to pay such tax. They must also provide details of how the alleged dept came into being and what interests the council have in your residence or property. They must also inform you of who is making the claim? One of the ways the council is getting away with fraud, is that they call all householders/residents occupiers. The correct term they should be using is inhabitant. For example. If 100 people where to take over any town square. They would be called occupiers. Simply put, to occupy means to have which is not your own.

They: claim that you the man/ woman owe money, must provide the evidence.of an agreement to pay. A contract with full disclosure and equal consideration.This is known as the

meeting of the minds. Once that has happened it is then put into action. Corporations do not have a mind. A dead body has no mind.

They also have to provide evidence that parliament is above the law. As we all know that everyone is equal in law. That includes all politicians & monarchs.

What is a courtroom ?

That would depend on who you ask. Many will say that it is where justice is served. The men and women who work there, the clerk, sheriff/judge and the P.F. more than likely do not know either. It’s a place where no facts or law shall be allowed, some call a courtroom. Is a court not the same as a tennis court, were you play ? The fact is, they are all playing or acting in a role. The language they use in these rooms are all in a foreign language, called legalese. Looks and sounds like english, but it’s not english. Therein lies the deception. Who is the sheriff / judge in the court. Is he a foreigner payed to sit in as a neutral entity ?

Another thing most men or women do not know is a little unknown fact, although it is vehemently denied. Courts are nothing more that ships in a dry dock. As most courts are near a body of water. The courts are under a different jurisdiction, once in there you are in a foreign land and under their jurisdiction, they have to have foreign liability insurance.

There are instances where the local council will hire one of these courtrooms privately, to create documents themselves. Is that not be fraud?

Then the council will send out theses forged documents,saying they are from the court. This should be challenged, as should the legality of this procedure. When you challenge them, do so as a man / woman and not as a person. You will come to understand that they can not deal with living men / women. The court system is only able to deal with the dead. Which links into the 1666 Cestui que vie act and the Cestui que vie trust.

According to the Government and the Police we are governed & policed by consent. Would you be surprised to learn that we are told that you can not remove your consent…………………..How does that work ?

Why are we repeatedly told …..” we’re policed & governed by consent ” when we can not opt out, ah lest we forget, the Government is not there for the benefit of the public. They are there for their own self interest. No most of them are there to sell, the public into bondage and servitude.

When did you start babbling ? If the truth be know we have clues as to when they the so called authorities began changing the meanings of words, and introduced new words. One of those times was when Shakespeare was writing his plays. They were adding some new words to replace other words, there was a lot of opposition to these forced changes at that time, as the public where not in favour of the changes, saying the the common language was being corrupted. Nowadays people have no idea of the meanings of the words that they are using,they have no idea of the dictionary used nor the meanings of the words. Looking at all letters & documents the state (Government & councils) they send out to the public. The body of words they use are called legalese….the words look like plain English words. Yet their meanings are totally different. The state knows that the average individual is not aware of the hidden meanings of the words. Stealth tactics to deliberately entrap people. Next time you receive any correspondences from the state ask them to confirm which dictionary they have used to compose such document / letter. All capital letters used by courts, councils & other governmental bodies are called dog latin.

The rollout of 5 G network or as the authorities are calling it, the deployment Military terms are being used. That would be a clue as to what and why it is being silently rolled out. The systems being deployed in major cities and towns across Britain. Have not been tested ,and will not be tested. Why ? When you know the outcome then there is no need for any tests !! Another fact is the Lloyds insurance has said that it would not insure the 5G network. Lloyds is the insurance company that would insure un insurable risks. That is when you know that there is something seriously wrong with the 5G.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2DSKl1ts0wBarrie Trower has been trying to make the public aware of the dangers of this wi-fi system explaining that it is a military grade weapon.

There are campaigners who are experts in the microwave energy weapons system, and have raised the alarm. Mark steele.

Mark was taken to court by the Gateshead council & the Police for a gagging order, which failed and Mark won.

Why have none of the telecoms industries carried out any checks or why is the government silent and siding with the telecoms industry. Sometimes it seems like that the corporations instruct the government in what to do and what policies to adopt. It is a well known fact the the government misled the people of Britain that smoking was beneficial for you and it would not have any harmful effects on anyone who smoked. Then the government said the asbestos was not harmful to men or woman. Those are but two instances that the government mislead the people.

Does anyone know where the word person comes from and why it is heavily used in today’s language?. Have you wondered why this word was introduced into our everyday vocabulary. At one point it was explained the the word was there to make it more gender neutral or that’s what the story was.  The word person is derived from the word persona.

 There are a lot of people who do not know that statutes and acts are not LAW. They are simply rules & regulations for  those who are *citizens. I wonder how one would go about giving up citizenship and remain being a man/woman. Would that be a way of not being forced into complying with the acts & statutes ??  

Interestingly the title ” MR “ comes from the maritime  world, a Mr is a subordinate on a ship. this then begs the question. Are we on a ship?  No we are upon tera firma. Why then are we the inhabitants of Britain the country (not to be confused with the  “United Kingdom”  which is a P.L.C. they are two different things entirely)  One of the reasons this is done, is that the country is being is administered by the law of contracts / commerce and the law of the sea = admiralty maritime which in turn is all about commerce.  Why does  the government force theses titles upon men and women, and then deny them the  true meaning and its origins. Simply put they are deceiving the men & women of th the country.

Click on the link for more info.

Common Law vs Statutes – Living by the Rule of Law

Sandy hook was an drill conducted by the security forces collectively.The whole episode was just an exercise which was filmed by the false media. There where no fatalities no suspects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWbk_xKCyME

The age old question never went away, it was always there lurking in the background. Do we live on a globe?  We have never solved that one nor has it been proven. On contrary the view that the world is a plane has been stifled  & covered up by both mainstream media and the main stream archaeology . The same media which has now been proved to be biased and full of  propaganda.

There are plenty of experiments proving that the world is not a globe.

As the technology  and techniques improve over the years, we are distracted by other new discoveries which are made. There are plenty of people who believe that the world is not a globe. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbQQBzXAQ1Q

What is money?
Originally in England, the unit of money was called “one pound sterling”. That was because it was literally, sterling silver a weighing one pound.   As it was quite difficult to carry several pounds weight of currency round with you, it was arranged that the actual silver could be held in a bank and a promissory note which was essentially, a receipt for the deposit of each pound of silver, was issued.   It was much easier to carry these “bank notes” around and to do business with them.   If you wanted to, you could always take these notes to a bank and ask for them to be cashed, and what happened then was that the bank would hand you the equivalent weight of sterling silver in exchange for the notes.

Today, the currency in England is still “bank notes” which are certainly easier to carry around, but there is one very important difference.   These notes are issued by the private company called “The Bank of England” (which is as good a name for a company as any other name).   However, if you were to take one of their bank notes to the premises of that company and ask for it to be cashed, all that they would do is give you another note with the same number of pounds written on it, or alternatively, some other notes with smaller numbers printed on them.   This is because, unlike the original bank notes, there is nothing of any physical value backing up the bank notes of today – they are only worth the physical paper on which they are printed.

It actually gets worse than that.   What happens most commonly nowadays is that they do not even bother printing those pieces of paper.   Now, they just tap some numbers into a computer record, or if they are old-fashioned enough, they write the numbers into a ledger.   What do those numbers represent?   Nothing at all – they have no actual value, in other words, just as much value as if you typed them into your own computer – quite meaningless.   And yet, a bank or other financial institution will merrily “lend” you those numbers in return for years of your work – now isn’t that really generous of them?

Actually, this is not at all funny, because if you don’t keep paying them money earned by your very real work, then they will attempt to take your house and possessions away from you.   This won’t happen if you understand that what they lent you was actually valueless.   Take the case of Jerome Daly of Minnesota in America.   In court, Jerome challenged the right of the bank to foreclose on his home which had been purchased with a loan from the bank.   Jerome argued that any mortgage contract required that both parties (that is, himself and the bank), to put up a legitimate form of property for the exchange.   In legal language, that is called a legitimate “consideration” put forward by both parties to the contract.

Jerome explained that the “money” was in fact, not the property of the bank as it had been created out of nothing as soon as the loan agreement was signed.   That is, the money does not come out of the bank’s existing assets as the bank is simply inventing it and in reality, the bank is putting up nothing of it’s own, except for a theoretical liability on paper.   As the court case progressed, the President of the bank, Mr Morgan, took the stand and admitted that the bank, in combination with the (privately owned commercial company called) “The Federal Reserve Bank”, created the entire amount of the loan in credit in it’s own books by means of a bookkeeping entry, the money and credit coming into existence when they created it.   Further, Mr Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this.   A lawful consideration must exist and must be tendered to support the loan agreement.   The jury found that there had been no lawful consideration put forward by the bank and so the court rejected the bank’s application for foreclosure and Jerome Daly kept his home.

That is exactly the situation with all British mortgages.   When someone makes an application for a mortgage or any other loan, the applicant’s signature is required on the application form before the loan is approved.   That signed application is a valuable piece of paper which the bank can lodge in it’s accounts as a credit to the bank for the amount of the loan.   The bank could just keep that application form and stay £100,000 or whatever, ahead, but they want more, much more.   They want the borrower to pay them that same amount again, funding it by years of work, and not only the amount of the supposed “loan” but significant extra in interest.   Why do you think that they are so keen to lend you “money” – they are even willing to lend to people with very poor credit records as there is no way that the bank can lose out on the deal, no matter what happens.

This is why, if a company starts demanding payment of large sums of money, you start by asking them to provide the “accounting” for the deal.   In other words, you are asking them to show in writing that they provided something of genuine worth as their side of the loan contract.   As they invented the money as numbers in their books with no real worth attached to those numbers, they are in deep trouble as they can’t comply with your demand to see their accounting for the deal.   Did you ever wonder how the average bank manages to make hundreds of millions of pounds profit every year?   Well, you are looking right at where a large chunk of it comes from.

I would recommend that you ask your local MP to explain this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNi6hc5Pc2k